Hegel mentions how the object and subject are not able to be known individually. The same as Kant and Shopenhaur. The only difference is that to Hegel to get to objective knowledge is by a dialectical process while Kant and Shopenhaur both hold there is no window into the dinge an sich.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

I noticed a kind of anti American feeling among immigrants. I could never figure it out. But then the anti americans began to take over the system and things really got out of control.
Read more
Authenticity was my motivation I believe for going to Shar Yashuv in NY and then the Mir. Reform Judaism did not seem all that authentic to me at the time. Nowadays I would have to revise my opinion. Not that the issue is all that clear one way or the other. True that the Litvak Yeshiva world is the most authentic approach to Torah. On the other hand there are lots of aspects that Reform and Conservative Judaism have that are not in the Litvak world.
Read more
When I saw the importance of  learning metaphysics and physics in Ibn Pakuda's חובות הלבבות it did not click with me right away. I was at the Mir in NY and was not looking for distractions from learning Gemara. still something of what he was saying must have stuck with me because later when I saw the same thing in the Guide of the Rambam, it started making sense that maybe that was the aspect of learning Torah that I had been lacking. However I really was not sure what to do with the metaphysics aspect of the whole thing.  On one hand the Ibn Pakuda and rambam were clear they were not talking about mysticism. [No offence intended towards the Remak (Moshe Cordovaro) and the Ari (Isaac Luria). It is just that that is not what the Rambam was talking about.] But what can one do with Metaphysics? What could be considered the be fulfilling what the Rambam was saying? Aristotle and Plato for sure. I guess Plotinus also. But what about later on people? To make this short I should ...
Read more